login | Contact Us | Subscribe to our Newsletter | Become a Member

Creative Communities Hub

Types of the very best abstracts submitted to the 2012-2013 selection that is abstract for the ninth annual North Carolina State University graduate student history conference.

Renfrew

Sample 1: “Asserting Rights, Reclaiming Space: District of Marshpee v. Phineas Fish, 1833-1843”

From May of 1833 to March of 1834, the Mashpee Wampancag tribe of Cape Cod Massachusetts waged an campaign that is aggressive gain political and religious autonomy from the state. In March of 1834, the Massachusetts legislature passed an act disbanding the white guardians appointed to conduct affairs when it comes to Mashpee tribe and incorporated Mashpee as an Indian district. The Mashpee tribe’s fight to bring back self-government and control of land and resources represents a”recover that is significant of space.” Equally significant is really what happened once that space was recovered.

The topic of this paper addresses an understudied and period that is essential a brief history associated with the Mashpee Wampanoag tribe. Despite a growing body of literature regarding the Mashpee, scholars largely neglect the time scale between 1834 and 1869. This paper looks as the Mashpee tribe’s campaign to dismiss Harvard appointed minister Phineas Fish; the fight to regain the parsonage he occupied, its resources, and also the community meetinghouse. This paper will argue the tribe asserted its power in the political and physical landscape to reclaim their meetinghouse therefore the parsonage land. Ultimately, this assertion contributed to shaping, strengthening, and remaking Mashpee community identity. This study examines legislative reports, petitions, letters, and legal documents to make a narrative of Native agency when you look at the antebellum period. Note: This is part of my larger thesis project (in progress0 “Mashpee Wampanoag Government Formation and the Evolving Community Identity in the District of Marshpee, 1834-1849.”

Sample 2: “Private Paths to public venues: Local Actors therefore the development of National Parklands within the American South”

This paper explores the connections between private individuals, government entities, and organizations that are non-governmental the creation of parklands for the American South. An investigation of parklands in the Southern United States reveals a reoccurring connection between private initiative and park creation while current historiography primarily credits the federal government with the creation of parks and protection of natural wonders. Secondary literature occasionally reflects the significance of local and non-government sources when it comes to preservation of land, yet these works still emphasize the significance of a bureaucracy that is national the tone fore the parks movement. Some works, including Jacoby’s Crimes Against Nature examine local actors, but focus on opposition into the imposition of brand new rules governing land when confronted with some threat that is outside. Regardless of scholarly recognition of non-government agencies and local initiative, the necessity of local individuals when you look at the development of parklands remains and understudies aspect of American environmental history. Several examples into the American South raise concerns in regards to the traditional narrative pitting governmental hegemony against local resistance. This paper argues for widespread, sustained interest in both nature preservation as well as in creating spaces for public recreation in the local level, and finds that the “private road to public parks” merits investigation that is further.

Note: This paper, entitled “Private Paths to Public Parks in the American South” was subsequently selected for publication in the NC State Graduate Journal of History.

Sample 3: Untitled

Previous generations of English Historians have produced a rich literature in regards to the Levellers and their role within the English Civil Wars (1642-1649), primarily focused on the Putney Debates and their contributions to Anglophone legal and thought that is political. Typically, their push to extend the franchise and espousal of a theory of popular sovereignty has been central to accounts of Civil War radicalism. Other revisionist accounts depict them as a sect that is fragmented of radicals whose religious bent marginalized and possibility that they will make lasting contributions to English politics or society. This paper seeks to locate a Leveller theory of religious toleration, while explaining how their conception of political activity overlapped their ideas that are religious. As opposed to centering on John Lilburne, often taken whilst the public face of this Leveller movement, this paper will focus on the equally intriguing and much more consistent thinker, William Walwyn. Surveying his personal background, published writings, popular involvement when you look at the Leveller movement, and attacks launched by his critics, i really hope to suggest that Walwyn’s unique contribution to Anglophone political thought was his defense of religious pluralism when confronted with violent sectarians who sought to wield control of the Church of England. Even though Levellers were ultimately best websites to buy essays suppressed, Walwyn’s dedication to a society that is tolerant a secular state should not be minimized but instead seen as section of a larger debate about Church-State relations across early modern Europe. Ultimately this paper is designed to play a role in the historiography that is rich of toleration and popular politics more broadly.

Sample 4: “Establishing a National Memory of Citizen Slaughter: a full case Study of this First Memory Site to Mass Murder in United States History – Edmond, Oklahoma, 1986-1989”

Since 1989, memory sites to events of mass murder have never only proliferated rapidly–they have become the expectation that is normative American society. For the vast majority of American history, however, events commonly defined as “mass murder” have led to no permanent memory sites and the sites of perpetration themselves have traditionally been either obliterated or rectified so that both the community together with nation could your investment tragedy and move on. All of this changed may 29, 1989 as soon as the community of Edmond, Oklahoma officially dedicated the “Golden Ribbon” memorial towards the thirteen people killed in the infamous “post office shooting” of 1986. In this paper I investigate the way it is of Edmond to be able to realize why it became the first memory site with this kind in United States history. I argue that the tiny town of Edmond’s unique political abnormalities at the time of this shooting, along with the near total community involvement established ideal conditions for the emergence for this unique type of memory site. I also conduct a historiography regarding the use of “the ribbon” to be able to illustrate how this has end up being the symbol of memories of violence and death in American society into the late century that is 20th. Lastly, I illustrate the way the lack that is notable of between people active in the Edmond and Oklahoma City cases after the 1995 Murrah Federal Building bombing–despite the close geographic and temporal proximity among these cases–illustrates this routinely isolated nature of commemorating mass murder and starkly renders the surprising quantity of aesthetic similarities why these memory sites share.

Sample 5: “Roman Urns and Sarcophagi: The search for Postmortem Identity throughout the Pax Romana”

“I am, the answer is ash and burnt embers;” thus read an anonymous early Roman’s burial inscription if you want to know who. The Romans dealt with death in a variety of ways which incorporated a range of cultural conventions and beliefs–or non-beliefs as in the case associated with “ash and embers.” Because of the turn regarding the first century of this era, the Romans practiced cremation almost exclusively–as the laconic eloquence for the anonymous Roman also succinctly explained. Cremation vanished by the third century, replaced by the practice for the distant past because of the fifth century. Burial first began to take hold in the western Roman Empire through the early second century, because of the appearance of finely-crafted sarcophagi, but elites from the Roman world would not talk about the practices of cremation and burial in detail. Therefore archaeological evidence, primarily in kind of burial vessels such as for example urns and sarcophagi represented the sole place to move to investigate the transitional to inhumation in the world that is roman. This paper analyzed a tiny corpus of these vessels to be able to identify symbolic elements which demarcate individual identities in death, comparing the patterns of those symbols to the fragments of text available relating to death in the Roman world. The analysis determined that the transition to inhumantion was a movement caused by a heightened desire in the right element of Romans to preserve identity in death during and after the Pax Romana.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine

  • Municipalities

  • Follow us on Twitter

  • Sarah Hale – Arden Batik: Frontenac CFDC

  • Author Spotlight

    Renfrew