login | Contact Us | Subscribe to our Newsletter | Become a Member

Creative Communities Hub

Down the Rabbit Hole: The Surprising Tale associated with Bunny Suit

Renfrew

Like Hugh Hefner himself, Playboy’s iconic costume ended up being a blend of provocative and traditional.

From the very first problem in 1953, Playboy’s publisher Hugh Hefner desired to tell apart it through the sex that is sleazy saved underneath the newsstand countertop and offered in brown paper bags. He once explained which he decided on a bunny while the magazine’s mascot “because of this funny intimate connotation,” but dressed him in a tuxedo “to include the notion of elegance.” The models might have been nude, however the articles had been authored by acclaimed writers like Norman Mailer, Kurt Vonnegut, Jack Kerouac, and Vladimir Nabokov and covered highbrow topics including “Picasso, Nietzsche, and jazz,” to quote Hefner’s basic editorial. Also JFK read it.

Likewise, as he exposed their very very first Playboy Club in Chicago in 1960, Hefner emphasized respectability above raunchiness—a preference commonly noted by authors reflecting on their legacy after their death at age 91 the other day. The Playboy Club had been a dinner club, maybe not really a intercourse club; coats and ties had been required. Though only guys could possibly be members—or “keyholders,” in Playboy parlance—they could bring guests that are female. The buffet offered legs that are crab filet mignon, and activity had been supplied by famous brands Nat King Cole, Steve Martin, Aretha Franklin, Billy Crystal, and Sammy Davis, Jr.

The most iconic symbols regarding the Playboy Club had been its waitstaff: a throng of females understood, and dressed, as Bunnies.

Similar to the groups themselves, the mag whoever title they shared, as well as the guy whom created the whole thing, the clothes used by the Playboy Bunnies had been a mixture of old-fashioned and provocative. The Bunny suit—a strapless bodysuit paired with rabbit ears and a fluffy tail—has become a cartoonish clichй of female sexuality, serving as a visual punchline in Bridget Jones’s Diary, Legally Blonde, Mean Girls, The House Bunny, and a host of other rom-coms since its debut. However the Bunny’s allure that is erotic the maximum amount of of a tease once the stuffing that so frequently filled out of the D-cups of her costume. Her skimpy suit promised further revelations that never came; her cuddly demeanor concealed the Bunnies’ circuit training, strict disciplinary policies, and astronomical paychecks. And in case feminists remain arguing over perhaps the Bunny suit had been constricting or liberating, it’s as it had been made to be both.

Relating to Kevin Jones, the curator for the Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising (FIDM) Museum, Hefner initially wanted the club’s waitresses to put on short, frilly nighties inspired by the Ziegfeld Follies girls—the intercourse symbols of their youth. But, as recounted in Kathryn Leigh Scott’s memoir The Bunny Years, Playmate Ilse Taurins—who ended up being dating the organization’s promotions director, Victor Lownes—pointed out that most those flimsy levels will be not practical for serving products and light cigarettes. It absolutely was her concept www.rose-brides.com/venezuelan-brides to dress the waitresses as distaff variations associated with magazine’s logo that is masculine. The bunny became a Bunny, and a symbol was created (and quickly patented—a first for a ongoing solution uniform).

The prototype—a that is first one-piece used over a prefab Merry Widow corset and paired with bunny ears and a fluffy tail—looked too similar to a swimsuit. A couple of snips associated with leg was raised by the scissors opening, elongating the feet, accentuating the crotch, and eliminating any resemblance to swimwear. Hefner himself insisted on incorporating the lacing that is criss-cross the top the leg, stated Jones, who’s got a Bunny suit inside the museum’s collection. Although the laces had been solely decorative—they couldn’t be untied or loosened—they revealed that a great deal more epidermis, and proposed the possibility that is tantalizing of wardrobe breakdown. A rosette title label during the right hipbone and dyed-to-match satin pumps finished the ensemble. However it ended up being the addition of a man’s tuxedo collar, bow tie, and cuffs in 1961 that pressed the Bunny suit into pop-culture legend.

“Everybody has this notion that the club had been extremely intimately liberated,” Jones said. The truth is, it had been pretty tame—a place for flirting at most of the. Therefore had been the Bunnies. The spouse of 1 keyholder declared the typical Bunny to be “so darn nice and respectable, you’d even allow your sibling marry her.” however, the mixture of overpriced cocktails and underdressed waitresses became a winning formula. Groups multiplied like rabbits; fundamentally, there is significantly more than 30 Playboy-branded groups global, in addition to gambling enterprises and resorts.

The presidential Papers, Norman Mailer described the Bunny suit thusly in his 1963 book

a Gay-Nineties rig which exaggerated their sides, bound their waistline . and lifted them in to a phallic breast that is brassiere—each such as the big bullet in the front bumper of a Cadillac. Long black stockings, long stockings, up almost into the waistline for each part, and also to the rear, regarding the curve associated with the might, just as if ejected tenderly through the human anatomy, had been the puff of chastity, only a little ball that is white of bunny’s end which bobbed because they moved.

It absolutely was a flattering if constricting design; Lownes observed that “the costumes took girls with also normal figures and made them seem like that they had amazing numbers.” Their remark is telling; not totally all Bunnies had been bombshells. The , maybe not one other means around.

From time one, “the suit had been a throwback,” Jones told me—to the 1950s if you don’t the Gay Nineties. The trendy silhouette associated with the 1960s was boyish, not curvy. Shapeless shifts and ballet flats might have been extremely popular from the runway, but within the club, it had been perpetually 1953: hourglass numbers, bullet bras, and three-inch heels. Truly the only concessions to fashion had been the Bunnies’ bouffant hairstyles, topped with artfully ears that are angled.

A small grouping of Playboy Bunnies line up for examination by Hugh Hefner, the publisher of Playboy mag, within the room that is main of Playboy Mansion in Chicago. Hefner is inspecting the latest enhanced fabric when it comes to costumes. (Bettmann / Getty Pictures)

Early site visitors towards the Playboy Club picked through to its heady dynamic of nasty and nice

Newsweek called it “a Disneyland for grownups.” Accordingly, the gown code for feminine workers ended up being in the same way strict and step-by-step because the enjoyment park’s famously rigid sartorial criteria. Every thing had been spelled out in careful information in a Bunny handbook and enforced by way of a Bunny mom, whom inspected each Bunny from mind to toe before her shift. Makeup products and fat were closely checked. Nail polish, jewelry, and eyeglasses had been strictly forbidden, though hairpieces had been motivated. Cuffs and collars must be starched and spotless; the bunny logo design cufflinks had to “kiss,” or face one another. Bunnies were accountable for purchasing unique (tax-deductible) satin pumps and achieving them colored to fit their matches and ears, which arrived in 12 colors that are different. “Our set is truly telling as it’s totally spattered with spilled products,” Jones said associated with the costume within the FIDM Museum. “They must-have been replaced a whole lot.” Dirty shoes, laddered stockings, as well as other infractions incurred demerits, that could result in a Bunny being fined and even fired.

Not even close to being exploited, the Bunnies “were really well protected women,” Jones said. They may have now been attention candy, nonetheless they had been supposed to be (literally) untouchable. Bouncers kept tipsy keyholders from groping or tails that are grabbing. (the yarn that is original had been replaced by fire-retardant fake fur by 1969 because “customers had been constantly attempting to light them,” Bunny Alice Nichols recalled within the Bunny Years.) Touching a Bunny ended up being grounds for expulsion. And Bunnies had been strictly forbidden from dating clients, entertainers, or any C-suite degree Playboy workers. They didn’t need sugar daddies, anyway—they made more in guidelines within one evening than the usual salesgirl at Bloomingdale’s will make in 2 months, based on Scott.

Certainly, the Bunnies’ bare, buxom image ended up being constantly an impression. The suit just arrived in 2 cup sizes: 34D and 36D. But those cups had been loaded with pouches to facilitate stuffing. (In “A Bunny’s Tale,” her 1963 exposй for Show mag, undercover Bunny Gloria Steinem recalled the club’s in-house wardrobe mistress telling her that “just about everybody things” while shoving a whole plastic dry cleansing bag down the front side of her suit.) Bunnies are not permitted to flex ahead, lest their assets (or stuffing) spill down in a tawdry display; whatever the case, the suit’s tight, boned bodice will have managed to get uncomfortable. Rather, these were taught to perform a few elegant, abnormal moves like the “Bunny Dip” and also the “Bunny Crouch” that permitted them to just take instructions and provide beverages without ever bending in the waistline. Though their cleavage had been offered through to a satin platter, Bunnies had been cinched in and covered up through the upper body down, putting on sheer Danskin that is black pantyhose flesh-toned Danskin tights, based on Jones.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • NewsVine

  • Municipalities

  • Follow us on Twitter

  • Sarah Hale – Arden Batik: Frontenac CFDC

  • Author Spotlight

    Renfrew